As courtrooms and congresses scramble to answer the ethical and philosophical questions around intellectual property ownership, the protection of people’s livelihoods, and the greater public good, the spread of AI images, music, and text continues. But as Musto says, “You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.” Legislators are still struggling to contain the sprawling World Wide Web 30 years since it was made public, and generative AI could cause an even more formidable challenge. “Has the machine already got to the point where it's learned to mimic, even if they request those images be removed?”ĭoran describes the creative industries as the “canary in a coalmine” of the generative AI revolution, and urges governments to protect traditional artists. “Traditional artists’ work has ended up in these data sets,” says Isabelle Doran, CEO of the Association of Photographers in the UK. Some platforms obtain permission from every artist included in their sets, but the most popular programs, Midjourney and DALL-E, were both trained on LAION-5B-a dataset of 5 billion images downloaded from the internet without their creators’ consent. The data sets used to train AI image-making tools have been a particular point of contention. It is taking past works, and playing with what they look like, and re-presenting that content to us.” “Essentially, AI is a really fancy, very technical, well-disguised collage. “We use the term ‘generation,’ which kind of makes people think of creation, where in actual fact it's recreation or collaging,” he says. Journalist Chris Stokel-Walker, the author of “TikTok Boom: The Inside Story of the World's Favorite App,” however, sees the common conception of artificial intelligence as an “incorrect use of terms.” The world has a tendency to anthropomorphize this technology, he explains, which doesn’t help with understanding the realities of it. While decades of film and television have prepared us for a future where machines take over menial and mundane tasks, I don’t remember seeing the one where machines started writing viral hits and producing otherworldly imagery. Posting as Gaxalactic on TikTok, where he has nearly 73,000, Musto made a name for himself with AI-generated images of gods of different countries. “Even though obviously it's not a real person with a real brain, there is some aspect of it that feels like you're really picking at the brain of something to see what it interprets,” says AI artist James Musto. The platform has been instrumental to the spread of AI art and through interacting with creators like Holliday and inputting their own prompts in the comments, followers almost create the art themselves. Holliday, who has a background in traditional art, is one of a growing number of AI-generated content creators on TikTok, where she’s become popular for visualizing phobias. But more recently, I got access to DALL-E and Midjourney, and that’s another level,” says 21-year-old British artist Lola Holliday. “When I was experimenting with the old technologies-which, bear in mind, was only a few months back-I was not very convinced. Since generative AI image-making tools went mainstream in 2022, social media has been flooded with such visualizations and convincing deepfakes, posted by a new breed of tech-savvy creators. ![]() In the future he wants to focus on addressing social, political, and environment issues in this way. ![]() “I enjoy the challenge of creating coherent animations and telling a story with AI art,” he says, noting that it takes “a lot of learning, trial and error, questioning, and perseverance” to create something meaningful. In “Deconstruction,” his thought-provoking video on human-induced climate change, a family of orangutans sit in a tree that becomes a burning forest, which is then destroyed by humans to make way for concrete cities. Since then, Comparelli has created more visually and emotionally impactful animations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |